Visibility systems for search and AI

Understand what is breaking before committing to a fix.

Best for

For companies with a material search or AI visibility problem whose cause is still unclear. That could be a migration-related decline, content crawlers cannot access, conflicting product information or absence from relevant AI recommendations.

You receive

• An evidence-backed diagnosis tied to specific pages, requests and buying questions.
• A prioritized roadmap with clear owners and next steps.
• Supporting tests and source material, including the limits of what was examined.
• A working readout with Zarko to challenge the findings and decide what happens next.

Scope

One website and one primary market, covering up to five agreed page templates and representative URLs. Where relevant, AI discovery testing covers up to ten agreed buying questions across two platforms.

We agree the test plan before starting. Larger estates, additional markets or deeper investigations receive a separate price. Implementation is outside the diagnostic scope.

The findings are yours to use with your own team. Continuing with CoreAEX is optional.

Give your team a defined solution they can implement.

Best for

For companies with a validated problem and the people to make the changes, but a need for specialist architecture, clear requirements and implementation review.

An engagement might define the search safeguards for a migration, repair structured data across key templates, or improve how pricing and product information support search and AI answers.

You receive

• A technical or content architecture for the agreed intervention.
• Implementation requirements and an ordered backlog with clear ownership.
• Acceptance criteria that describe how delivery will be checked.
• A working handoff and two agreed implementation review rounds.

Who implements

Your team implements. Zarko designs the solution, works directly with the people responsible and reviews the agreed work against its acceptance criteria.

Starting scope

One defined intervention on one website. The fixed project fee reflects the affected templates, systems, markets and coordination required. Development, content production and additional workstreams are priced separately unless included in the proposal.

Get active help delivering the changes and checking what follows.

Best for

For companies that need specialist execution alongside architecture, coordination and verification, with support after implementation.

You receive

• Architecture and requirements for the agreed intervention.
• Hands-on technical or content work explicitly assigned to CoreAEX.
• Coordination with your developers and content owners.
• Verification of the released changes against agreed acceptance criteria.
• Ninety days of follow-up, including three monthly reviews and agreed improvements within the original scope.

Who implements

Zarko stays involved through delivery and follow-up. Before work begins, the proposal identifies what CoreAEX will change, what your team will deliver and who owns production deployment.

Starting scope

One defined intervention on one website. The fee depends on implementation complexity and the follow-up work included. External development fees are separate unless expressly included. Broader rebuilds, additional markets and new workstreams require their own scope.

Continued support after the included period is agreed separately.